Best AEO Tools (2026): 12 Answer Engine Platforms Reviewed

AEO tools show whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and other answer engines cite your brand, for which prompts, and what to fix next.

We reviewed 12 AEO tools on November 5, 2026, using each vendor’s own documentation and pricing pages. This is a documentation-based review, not hands-on testing.

Addlly AI publishes this list of best answer engine optimization (AEO) tools and places its own platform first. Every other tool is described only from its public documentation, with a source and date next to each price. Use the comparison table for a quick view, or go straight to the use-case section if you already know what you need.

Key Takeaways

• AEO tools track brand visibility, citations and mentions inside AI-generated answers, not blue links.
• Per-engine reporting matters because ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode cite different sources.
• Many entry plans track 15 to 50 prompts on three or four engines, so check limits first.
• Best AEO tools split into trackers, SEO suites with AI features, and platforms that execute fixes.
• Addlly AI publishes this list; competitor facts come from vendor documentation dated November 2026.

What Are AEO Tools?

AEO tools are software platforms that measure and improve brand visibility in AI-generated answers. They send buyer prompts to answer engines such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode, then record which brands each answer names and which pages it cites.

Answer engine optimization (AEO) is the practice of earning those mentions and citations. Traditional SEO tools measure where a page ranks in traditional search results on search engines. AEO tools measure whether the brand appears inside AI-powered search results, because a buyer who asks an AI assistant may never scroll to the blue links. In AI-driven search, the answer itself is the result.

The core AI visibility metrics are mention rate, citation rate, share of voice and sentiment, reported by engine and by prompt.

Good AI visibility tracking shows which AI engines mention your brand, which skip it, and which competitor they name instead. AI mentions without citations usually point to a source problem: the engine knows the brand but trusts other pages. AI visibility monitoring over time then shows whether those gaps close.

When comparing best AEO software, start with how each tool handles citations.

Two neighboring categories overlap with AEO tools. If you mainly need brand mention monitoring, see our guide to AI visibility tools. If you need software that handles content optimization and schema at scale for generative engine optimization (GEO), see our list of GEO tools. This page stays at the answer and citation level: which prompt, which engine, which source, and what to fix.

How Do AEO Tools Track Citations in AI Answers?

AEO tools track citations by sending a fixed set of prompts to each AI engine on a schedule, then parsing all AI responses for AI mentions, linked sources and sentiment. Unlike search engines, answer engines rewrite the result for every prompt, so there is no fixed rank to check.

The result is a prompt-by-engine record of who was named and which pages AI systems retrieve to build each answer.

Three details decide how useful that record is:

1. Cited vs mentioned. A mention means the AI engine named your brand in the text. A citation means it linked your page as a source, and these AI citations are what send referral traffic. Good tools report both, because a brand can be mentioned while its own site is never cited.
2. Per-engine vs averaged. AI engines cite different sources for the same question. A study tracked citations across seven AI engines from September 2025 to March 2026 and found each engine had its own preferred sources, such as Wikipedia for ChatGPT and YouTube for Gemini. One averaged AI visibility score hides those differences across major AI engines.
3. Collection method and repeat runs. Some tools query AI models through APIs, while others capture the consumer interface a real user sees. Some also log AI crawler visits to show which pages AI bots read. AI-generated responses change as models update, and AI answers vary from run to run, so tools that repeat prompts give steadier visibility data than a single snapshot.

A practical test: pick five prompts your buyers ask, then check whether a tool shows the cited URLs for each engine, not only a score.

For the numbers worth reporting to leadership, see our guide to AEO metrics. Google Search Console still matters for Google clicks, but it does not show which brands an AI answer names, which sources it cites, or your AI search visibility outside Google.

How We Reviewed These AEO Tools

This list is a documentation-based review, not hands-on testing. To build this best AEO tools list, we checked each AEO tool’s official website, product documentation and pricing page on November 5, 2026, and recorded only what the vendor states. We reviewed answer engine optimization (AEO) platforms only, so AI writing tools are excluded.

What We Checked in Each AEO Tool?

We looked at five things that decide whether a tool can explain, at the answer level, why a brand is or is not cited.

• Citation and source tracking: Does the tool show which pages and domains each answer cites, including competitor and third-party sources across major AI platforms?
• Per-engine reporting and coverage: Which major AI engines and answer engines are tracked, and can you read results engine by engine instead of as one average?
• Prompt coverage: How many prompts the entry plan allows for prompt tracking, and whether prompts can be customized or drawn from demand data.
• Competitor benchmarking: Share of voice and citation comparison against named rivals.
• Optimization guidance or execution: Recommendations, content or schema help, or a team that implements fixes.

Review Method and Date

Every fact about a competitor comes from that vendor’s own site, accessed November 5, 2026, and each price links to its source.

Vendors change plans often, so check the linked page before you buy. Where a vendor does not publish a detail, we say so instead of guessing. Engine lists, prompt limits and prices reflect each vendor’s documentation on that date.

We did not run the same prompts through each tool, so this review does not compare data accuracy between tools. Treat it as a shortlist of best AEO options to test, not a lab test.

Disclosure: Addlly AI Publishes This List

Addlly AI publishes this list and places its own platform first. Facts about Addlly AI come from its internal product documentation. Every other tool is described only from its public documentation.

Ranks 2 to 12 follow how fully each tool’s documentation covers the five checks above. We state each competitor’s strengths plainly, including where a competitor is stronger than Addlly AI. If you spot an outdated fact about any tool, the vendor’s linked page is the source of truth.

AEO Tools Compared: Quick Comparison Table

The table below compares the 12 best AEO tools in this review by best fit, engines covered, strengths, limitations and pricing model. All prices come from vendor pricing pages accessed November 5, 2026. Engine counts refer to the plan named, and entry plans often track fewer engines than enterprise plans.

1. Addlly AI

Addlly AI is an AI search visibility platform for enterprise and multi-market brands. It audits how AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Claude answer buyers’ questions, traces which sources they cite, and fixes the pages behind the gaps.

Addlly AI’s angle is audit to execution, not AI visibility tracking alone. Its GEO Audit runs 250+ consumer-style prompts per brand and reports results per engine instead of averaging them into one AI visibility score.

Key Features of Addlly AI

• Citation Source Forensics: The source mix behind every answer, split into owned, competitor-driven and third-party sources.
• Per-platform reporting: Mention rate, share of voice and sentiment for each engine, including AI Mode and regional engines such as AI Hay.
• Competitor benchmarking: Against named rivals, with an action plan ranked by commercial impact.
• Execution: AI GEO Agent for content optimization, AI Schema Markup Generator for structured data, PDP AI Agent, or Managed GEO Services.

Addlly AI Pros

• Diagnosis and fixes in one platform, or through a managed team.
• Reports by market and language for brands selling in several countries.
• SOC 2 Type II compliant and ISO 27001 certified.

Addlly AI Cons

• No self-serve plan and no trial; every engagement starts with a scoped audit.
• Platform setup typically takes 2 to 6 days, depending on the website.
• Built for enterprises and agencies, not freelancers or individual users.

Addlly AI Pricing and Best Fit

Addlly AI pricing is custom, scoped per brand, with a one-time setup plus a monthly fee (Addlly AI pricing, November 2026). It fits enterprise marketing teams and agencies that want citation diagnosis and fixes in one place.

See which sources AI engines cite for your category. The Addlly AI team can walk you through Citation Source Forensics on your own prompts.

Get Your Free GEO Audit Today

2. Profound

Profound is an AEO platform for enterprise teams that monitors how brands appear across answer engines. Its Enterprise plan covers up to nine engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode, Gemini, DeepSeek, Claude, AI Overviews, Exa Search and Muse Spark.

Profound pairs that tracking with Prompt Volumes, a dataset of prompt demand, so teams can track the questions buyers ask most.

Profound states that it tracks citations, sentiment, ranking and competitive presence, but its pricing page does not assign each feature to a specific plan.

Key Features of Profound

• Answer Engine Insights: How your brand and competitors appear across AI platforms.
• Agent Analytics: AI-sourced traffic and AI crawler analytics, with integrations such as Cloudflare, Akamai and Fastly.
• Agents and Projects: Content creation workflows that turn suggestions into drafts.
• ChatGPT Shopping: Product visibility tracking on Enterprise.

Profound Pros

• Nine engines on Enterprise, including Claude and AI Mode.
• Prompt demand data helps decide which prompts to track.
• Tracking, content and attribution sit in one platform.

Profound Cons

• The trial runs a fixed set of 50 prompts for seven days on three engines.
• Custom prompts, regions and languages need an Enterprise contract.
• Enterprise pricing is not published.

Profound Pricing and Best Fit

Profound lists a seven-day trial and custom Enterprise pricing. Profound fits large brands with a dedicated AEO budget that want prompt demand data next to citation tracking.

3. Conductor

Conductor is an enterprise SEO and AEO platform whose AI Search Performance report tracks AI mentions, website citations and sentiment across AI search engines in more than 160 countries. Supported answer engines include ChatGPT (Auto and Search modes), Claude, Gemini, AI Mode and Perplexity, plus AI Overviews.

For citation work, Conductor’s public documentation is the most detailed we reviewed. Each tracked prompt is labeled Cited, Not Cited or No Citations Found, with the full response and its citations one click away.

Key Features of Conductor

• Citation share of voice: Top cited pages for your site and for competitors.
• Performance by AI engine: Read by citation, mention, cited pages or sentiment.
• Persona and intent views: Plus fan-out queries for several engines.
• AI referral traffic and AI crawler activity: Tied to analytics data in the Pages report.

Conductor Pros

• Separates mentions and citations, prompt by prompt.
• Connects AI citations to traffic, conversions and existing SEO reporting.
• Broad country coverage for global brands.

Conductor Cons

• Prices are not published; Growth and Enterprise tiers are quoted.
• AI tracking draws on a credit allowance, such as 2,500 AI Search Credits per year on Growth.
• Most useful for teams already running Conductor for SEO.

Conductor Pricing and Best Fit

Conductor uses usage-based tiers (Essentials, Growth and Enterprise) with no published prices. Conductor fits enterprise search teams that want AEO reporting inside their existing SEO platform.

4. Goodie

Goodie is an AI search visibility platform for answer engine optimization that monitors brand mentions, citations, tone and share of voice in AI-generated answers. Its AI visibility tracking covers 5 answer engines on Core, 8 on Pro and up to 14 on Enterprise, including shopping assistants such as Amazon Alexa and Walmart’s Sparky.

Goodie includes an optimization action layer on every plan, so tracking comes with a prioritized list of fixes.

Key Features of Goodie

• Visibility Monitoring: Citation tracking and tone of coverage.
• Optimization Actions and Content Studio: Prioritized fixes and AI-ready content.
• AI Traffic Analytics and AI Agent Analytics: Which AI platforms send visitors and how AI crawler bots read your site.
• Agentic Commerce Suite: Product visibility in AI shopping answers.

Goodie Pros

• Strong fit for retail and CPG brands that sell through AI shopping assistants.
• Action credits on every plan, not only monitoring.
• Unlimited seats and MCP access from Core.

Goodie Cons

• Claude, Meta AI and Grok appear only on Enterprise.
• Pro and Enterprise start with a demo.
• Core covers one brand and 110 prompts.

Goodie Pricing and Best Fit

Goodie lists Core at $295/month, Pro at $999/month and Enterprise as a custom quote. Goodie fits ecommerce and CPG brands that need AI shopping assistant coverage next to AEO tracking.

5. AthenaHQ

AthenaHQ is an AEO platform that tracks AI visibility across 11 models on its Starter plan: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI and Mistral. It pairs tracking with on-page and off-page action recommendations.

Starter includes citation intelligence, while the Athena Citation Engine (ACE) is listed for Enterprise only.

AthenaHQ’s pricing page does not say whether results can be broken out engine by engine, so ask for a per-engine report during a demo.

Key Features of AthenaHQ

• Sources and competitor insights: Available from the entry tier.
• Unlimited competitors: Included on Starter.
• Content optimization agent: With brand voice enforcement.
• Enterprise extras: Athena Recommendation Engine, SSO and multi-region support.

AthenaHQ Pros

• Eleven AI models on a self-serve plan, including Claude and Meta AI.
• Recommendations cover both on-page and off-page actions.
• One month of credit rollover on Starter.

AthenaHQ Cons

• Credit-based usage (1 credit equals 1 AI response) needs budgeting.
• ACE and the advanced content agent are Enterprise-only.
• API access is a paid add-on on Starter.

AthenaHQ Pricing and Best Fit

AthenaHQ lists an Essential tier with $25 in credits, Starter at $295/month and custom Enterprise pricing. AthenaHQ fits mid-market teams that want broad engine coverage without an enterprise contract.

6. Peec AI

Peec AI is an AI search analytics platform that reports visibility, position and sentiment by model, topic, country and competitor. Self-serve plans let you pick 3 AI models from ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini and Naver AI, with Perplexity and others as add-ons.

Peec AI’s source analytics go down to domain and URL on every plan, which is rare at its entry price.

Peec AI’s gap analysis helps with outreach planning, because it lists third-party pages that cite competitors and leave your brand out.

Key Features of Peec AI

• Source analytics: Citation share, retrievals and subdomain tracking.
• Source classification: Competitor, editorial, reference and UGC sources.
• Gap analysis: Sources that name competitors but not your brand.
• Recommended actions: Split into earned and owned, plus agent actions.

Peec AI Pros

• URL-level citation data on every plan.
• Unlimited competitors, with multi-country tracking from Pro.
• Shopping source visibility for product prompts.

Peec AI Cons

• Only 3 models on Starter, Pro and Advanced.
• Claude is available on Enterprise.
• Starter tracks 50 prompts in one country.

Peec AI Pricing and Best Fit

Peec AI lists Starter at $95/month, Pro at $245/month, Advanced at $495/month and custom Enterprise pricing. Peec AI fits marketing teams that want clean source-level reporting across a few chosen engines.

7. Scrunch AI

Scrunch AI is an AEO platform that combines citation tracking with page audits and an Agent Experience Platform (AXP). All plans cover these answer engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews and Meta.

Scrunch describes its Agent Experience Platform as an AI-friendly version of your site for AI-driven experiences, which sets it apart from tracking-only tools.

Scrunch also tracks personas, so a brand can see whether answers change for different buyer types.

Key Features of Scrunch AI

• Citation and source tracking: Included on every plan.
• Page Audits: Actionable fixes, with 5 audits on Starter and 10 on Growth.
• Agent traffic monitoring: Attributes AI-driven visits.
• Prompts and personas: 350 custom prompts and 3 personas on Starter.

Scrunch AI Pros

• Claude and Meta tracked from the entry plan.
• The Agent Experience Platform addresses how AI agents read the site.
• 7-day trial on Starter.

Scrunch AI Cons

• The pricing page does not describe competitor benchmarking.
• The page does not say which plans include the Agent Experience Platform.
• Page audits are capped on self-serve plans.

Scrunch AI Pricing and Best Fit

Scrunch lists Starter at $250/month billed annually ($300 month to month), Growth at $417/month billed annually and custom Enterprise pricing. Scrunch AI fits technical marketing teams that want tracking plus control over what AI agents see.

8. Ahrefs Brand Radar

Ahrefs Brand Radar tracks brand visibility, mentions and citations across AI answers, using an index that Ahrefs says holds 531 million+ prompts built from real search demand. The AI Visibility Index covers AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot, and Custom Prompts adds Claude.

Brand Radar separates mentions in the answer text from citations to your pages, which is the split answer-level work needs.

Key Features of Ahrefs Brand Radar

• AI Share of Voice: Your mentions and citations against competitors in your topic set.
• Custom prompt tracking: Daily, weekly or monthly checks.
• Fan-out queries: The searches AI runs behind each prompt.
• Citation opportunities: Plus AI traffic and bot-visit analytics.

Ahrefs Brand Radar Pros

• Large prompt index for market-level research.
• Works inside the Ahrefs suite many search marketers already use.
• Tracks offsite sources such as YouTube, Reddit and TikTok.

Ahrefs Brand Radar Cons

• The AI Visibility Index is re-tested monthly on a 90-day window.
• Custom Prompts plans start at 5 prompts.
• Little built-in execution beyond citation opportunities.

Ahrefs Brand Radar Pricing and Best Fit

Ahrefs lists Custom Prompts from $50/month and the AI Visibility Index from $199/month. Brand Radar fits SEO teams on Ahrefs that want market-level AI share of voice.

9. BrightEdge

BrightEdge AI Catalyst is the AI search layer of the BrightEdge enterprise SEO platform. It tracks how a brand appears in ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode, plus other AI platforms, and turns visibility gaps into actions.

BrightEdge measures citations separately from mentions, so teams can see which of the two drives a change over time.

BrightEdge also explains the reasoning behind each sentiment rating, which helps brand teams show why an engine frames a competitor more positively.

Key Features of BrightEdge

• Citation tracking: How often the brand is cited as a source, apart from mentions.
• Mention sentiment: Positive, neutral or negative, with reasoning, for you and competitors.
• Competitor benchmarking: Mention and citation presence broken out by engine.
• Content briefs: Built from the page that currently earns the citation, plus outreach suggestions.

BrightEdge Pros

• Engine-level competitor view.
• Recommendations name the page to beat.
• Fits teams already reporting SEO in BrightEdge.

BrightEdge Cons

• Pricing is not published.
• The page names five engines and does not list the others.
• Built for enterprise budgets.

BrightEdge Pricing and Best Fit

BrightEdge does not publish AI Catalyst pricing; access starts with a demo. BrightEdge fits enterprise search teams that already run BrightEdge.

10. HubSpot AEO

HubSpot AEO is HubSpot’s answer engine optimization tool, sold standalone or included in Marketing Hub. It tracks a brand visibility score, prompts, citations and sentiment across three answer engines: ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.

HubSpot AEO’s citation analysis shows which domains, pages and content types AI cites, and how your citation rate compares with competitors.

Because HubSpot AEO tracks only three engines, teams that sell where Copilot or Google AI Overviews matter will need a second tool.

Key Features of HubSpot AEO

• Prompt suggestions: Based on your CRM data.
• Citation analysis: By domain, page and content type.
• Sentiment and share of voice: Compared with competitors.
• Recommendations: Connected to HubSpot content creation tools, such as blog drafts.

HubSpot AEO Pros

• Low entry price for continuous AI visibility tracking.
• Acts on gaps inside HubSpot without switching tools.
• 28-day trial on the standalone plan.

HubSpot AEO Cons

• Three engines only, with no Claude, Copilot or Google AI Overviews.
• 25 prompts on the standalone plan.
• The product is labeled beta.

HubSpot AEO Pricing and Best Fit

HubSpot lists standalone AEO at $50/month ($45 billed annually) for 25 prompts, and includes AEO in Marketing Hub Professional (from $800/month) and Enterprise. HubSpot AEO fits marketing teams already on HubSpot.

11. Otterly.AI

Otterly.AI is an AI search monitoring tool that tracks AI mentions and citations across four answer engines on every plan: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot. Claude, AI Mode and Gemini are add-ons. It has the lowest paid entry point in this list.

Otterly.AI includes Citation Source Tracking and Link Citations Analysis on all plans, which is uncommon at this price.

Its GEO audit also checks URLs on your own site, so small teams can see both who gets cited and which of their pages need work.

Key Features of Otterly.AI

• Citation source tracking: Plus link citation analysis.
• Domain Ranking: The domains AI cites most for your prompts.
• GEO audit: Monthly URL audit quotas on every plan.
• Recommendations: 3 per week on Lite, unlimited on higher plans.

Otterly.AI Pros

• Citation data from the lowest-priced plan.
• Easy to start with a small prompt set.
• API, MCP and Agent Analytics from Standard.

Otterly.AI Cons

• Lite tracks only 15 prompts.
• Claude, AI Mode and Gemini cost extra on each plan.
• The pricing page is inconsistent on competitor limits.

Otterly.AI Pricing and Best Fit

Otterly.AI lists Lite at $29/month, Standard at $189/month, Premium at $489/month and custom Enterprise pricing. Otterly.AI fits small teams testing AI visibility tracking before moving to a larger platform.

12. Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

The Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit adds AI search tracking to the Semrush SEO suite. It puts AI search visibility data next to keyword data. Its base plan tracks mentions across answer engines including ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity, with 25 custom prompts and a Brand Performance report for one domain.

Its Visibility Overview shows cited pages and cited sources, so teams can see which of their pages and which external domains AI-generated answers rely on.

Key Features of Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

• AI Visibility Score: Benchmarked against top industry competitors.
• Prompt tracking: Daily data for 25 custom prompts.
• Competitor and Prompt Research: Drawn from a database Semrush says holds 317 million+ prompts.
• AI readiness audit: Site checks on up to 100 pages.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit Pros

• Sits inside an SEO suite many marketers already use.
• Cited sources and cited pages in one report.
• Prompt tracking across 220+ countries and territories.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit Cons

• Brand Performance uses synthetic prompts and updates weekly.
• 25 prompts on base; 50 more cost $60/month.
• Each extra user or Brand Performance domain costs $99.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit Pricing and Best Fit

Semrush lists the AI Visibility Toolkit at $99/month per domain billed annually, and Semrush One from $199/month. The toolkit fits SEO teams already working in Semrush.

How to Choose an AEO Tool by Use Case

Best AEO tools differ most in the question they answer: where your brand appears, why a competitor is cited instead, or who will fix the gap. Start from the use case below, then confirm engine coverage and prompt limits on the vendor’s pricing page.

For Enterprise Brands That Need Citation Diagnosis and Fixes

Enterprise brands need a platform that shows the source behind each answer and a way to act on it. Addlly AI combines Citation Source Forensics with GEO agents and managed fixes. Profound and Conductor suit large teams that want deep tracking and will run fixes in-house. Ask each vendor to show one of your own prompts, the sources cited on each engine, and the recommended fix.

For SEO Teams Already Using an SEO Suite

SEO teams that already pay for Semrush, Ahrefs, Conductor or BrightEdge can add AI search tracking without a new vendor or leaving traditional SEO workflows. The Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit and Ahrefs Brand Radar fit teams that want AI data next to keyword data. Expect weekly or monthly refreshes on some reports.

For Multi-Market and Multilingual Brands

Multi-market brands should check country and language limits before counting answer engines. Addlly AI reports by market and language, including regional engines. Peec AI adds multi-country tracking from its Pro plan, and Conductor covers 160+ countries. Ask how each tool handles local-language prompts and regional engines.

For Ecommerce and Retail Brands

Ecommerce brands need coverage of AI shopping assistants, because a buyer may ask an AI assistant for a product, not a search box. Goodie tracks Amazon Alexa and Walmart’s Sparky, and Peec AI reports shopping sources. Addlly AI checks how product pages perform as citation sources on your own site and on marketplaces.

For Agencies Managing Multiple Clients

Agencies need multi-client workspaces and client-ready reports. Addlly AI offers multi-client workspaces and white-label reporting. Peec AI has separate agency pricing, and Goodie offers agency packages on Enterprise. Check whether client reports can carry your branding and whether each client needs a separate license.

For Small Teams Starting AEO on a Budget

Small teams should start with a short prompt set on three or four AI platforms. Otterly.AI from $29/month and HubSpot AEO from $50/month both give low-cost AI visibility monitoring with citation data. Move to a larger platform once you know which prompts matter.

Once a tool shows visibility gaps, the fix is usually content and structured data work on the pages AI should cite. Our guide on how to appear in AI search results covers that next step.

Frequently Asked Questions About AEO Tools

See Where AI Engines Cite You With a GEO Audit

Best AEO tools show where your brand appears. A GEO audit shows why, and what to change. Addlly AI’s GEO Audit runs 250+ consumer-style prompts for your brand, reports mention rate, share of voice and sentiment for each AI engine, and traces the owned, competitor and third-party sources behind every AI-generated answer. You get competitor benchmarking against named rivals, a prioritized action plan ranked by commercial impact, and a walkthrough with the Addlly AI team.

• GEO Audit: See which sources each engine cites for your category.
• AI GEO Agent: Create and update the content those answers need.
• AI Schema Markup Generator: Add structured data that AI systems can read.